CCM JetSpeed FT2 vs CCM Ribcor 88K Ice Hockey Skates

Put ice hockey skates head to head to compare size, weight, and more.

vs

Comparisons

The CCM JetSpeed FT2 is a great choice for a beginner to intermediate level player. The Ribcor 88K is a great choice for an intermediate to advanced level player. The JetSpeed has a bit more support and stability, while the Ribcor is a bit lighter and faster.

Ice Hockey Skates CCM JetSpeed FT2 CCM Ribcor 88K Hockey Skate
Summary
Rating
Review Rating 100%
Review Rating Not Rated
Rank
#3400
#8823
Weight 721 Grams 322 Grams
Heat Moldable Yes
Holder Speedblade XS
Runner SB XS1 Black
Tongue Material Metatomic Tongue With Molded Lace-Bite Protection
Boot Construction LiteFrame 360 Evo - One Piece
Liner Totaldri Pro + With Durazone Abrasion Protection
Outsole Construction N/A (1-Piece Boot)
Footbed CCM Orthomove
Warranty 90 Days 30 Days
Product Line JetSpeed
Product Length 0.00
Stick Finish Grip
Textured No
Length 40 Flex: 49", 50 Flex: 52"
Construction Material SigmaTex
Kick Point Position Mid
Shaft Design Jetspeed Shaft
Blade Construction JF-80 BLADE
Tapered X-FLOW TECHNOLOGY
Family JetSpeed
Details
Brand CCM CCM
Prices
MSRP $114.99 $349.99
Used Price $80.49 $244.99
Sale Price $103.49 $314.99

Ice Hockey Skates Descriptions

CCM JetSpeed FT2

The CCM JetSpeed FT2 is a high-performance, low-profile hockey stick designed for speed and quickness on the ice. The stick features a carbon fiber shaft and blade for stiffness and durability, and a unique blade construction that helps reduce drag for faster shot speeds. The FT2 also has an ergonomic grip design and a lightweight feel for improved control and comfort.

CCM Ribcor 88K Hockey Skate

The CCM Ribcor 88K Hockey Skate is a great choice for the recreational to intermediate level player who is looking for a comfortable and supportive skate. The 88K features a Ribcor ribbed outsole for added energy transfer and a supportive microfiber lining for comfort. The multi-density foam ankle support provides good foot stability and protection, while the Anatomical Response footbed provides good arch support and helps reduce foot fatigue.

Suggested Comparisons