CCM JetSpeed FT460 vs CCM Ribcor 90K Ice Hockey Skates

Put ice hockey skates head to head to compare size, weight, and more.

vs

Comparisons

The CCM JetSpeed FT460 Ice Hockey Skates offer a great fit with their asymmetrical toe cap, while the CCM Ribcor 90K Skates provide ultimate comfort and performance with their ribbed outsole and custom fit footbed. Both Skates are designed for speed and offer excellent ankle support, but the JetSpeed FT460 Skates have a lower profile and are lighter weight, making them ideal for players who want to move quickly on the ice.

Ice Hockey Skates CCM JetSpeed FT460 Ice Hockey Skates CCM Ribcor 90K Hockey Skate
Summary
Rating
Review Rating 96%
Review Rating Not Rated
Rank
#3402
#8824
Heat Moldable Yes Yes
Replaceable Steel No
Sizes 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.5 9.0 10.0 10.5 11.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5
Width D EE
Age Group Senior Junior
Weight 638 Grams
Holder SPEEDBLADE 4.0
Runner SB STAINLESS
Tongue Material Felt Tongue
Boot Construction SYNTHETIC COMPOSITE
Liner HD MICRO FIBER
Outsole Construction REINFORCED INJECTION
Footbed ANATOMICAL RESPONSE
Warranty 90 Days
Product Line JetSpeed
Details
Brand CCM CCM
Prices
MSRP $95.99 $549.99
Used Price $67.19 $384.99
Sale Price $86.39 $494.99

Ice Hockey Skates Descriptions

CCM JetSpeed FT460 Ice Hockey Skates

The CCM JetSpeed FT460 Ice Hockey Skates are the perfect choice for the intermediate to advanced level player. They offer a great level of support and stability, while still providing good agility and speed. The FT460 skate features a comfortable and super-fast SpeedBlade 4.0 holder with stainless steel SpeedBlade XS Blades.

CCM Ribcor 90K Hockey Skate

The CCM Ribcor 90K Hockey Skate is a high-performance skate designed for the aggressive player. The skate features a Ribcor-flex profile that provides increased energy transfer and speed, while the 90K composite outsole provides excellent support and stability. The CCM Ribcor 90K Hockey Skate is a great choice for the aggressive player who wants the best in speed and performance.

Suggested Comparisons