CCM JetSpeed FT485 vs CCM Vector 4.0 Ice Hockey Skates

Put ice hockey skates head to head to compare size, weight, and more.


What we think

CCM JetSpeed FT485 vs CCM Vector 4.0 Ice Hockey Skates The CCM JetSpeed FT485 skate is designed for the player who wants speed and agility on the ice. It features a light-weight construction and a low-profile blade holder that provides excellent maneuverability while the anatomical fit ensures maximum comfort and support. The CCM Vector 4.0 skate is ideal for the power player who wants skating speed and precision. It features an anatomically correct fit with a comfortable foam liner and a reinforced torsion-box outsole for maximum energy transfer.

Ice Hockey Skates CCM JetSpeed FT485 Ice Hockey Skates CCM Vector 4.0 Hockey Skates
Review Rating Not Rated
Review Rating Not Rated
Heat Moldable Yes No
Replaceable Steel Yes No
Age Group Senior Intermediate Junior Youth
Sizes 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.5 9.0 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 8.0Y 9.0Y 10.0Y 10.5Y 11.0Y 11.5Y 12.0Y 12.5Y 13.0Y 13.5Y
Width Regular Wide
MSRP $99.99 $39.98
Used Price $69.99 $27.99
Sale Price $89.99 $35.98

Ice Hockey Skates Descriptions

CCM JetSpeed FT485 Ice Hockey Skates

If you want a skate that will help you fly on the ice, the CCM JetSpeed FT485 Ice Hockey Skates are the ones for you. With a speedlace system and a lightweight design, these Skates are made for speed and agility. The reinForced ankle support andPro-Integrated Molded Lacing System ensure a comfortable and secure fit, while the Thermo-Max liners keep your feet warm and dry.

CCM Vector 4.0 Hockey Skates

The CCM Vector 4.0 Hockey Skates are high-performance Skates that offer a great level of comfort and support. They feature a stiff boot construction that provides excellent energy transfer, and a lightweight design that makes them easy to maneuver on the ice. The Vector 4.0 Skates also feature a comfortable liner that hugs your feet and ankles, and a responsive blade that gives you great power and control.

Suggested Comparisons