CCM JetSpeed FT2 vs Reebok RBK 3K Ice Hockey Skates

Put ice hockey skates head to head to compare size, weight, and more.

vs

Comparisons

The CCM JetSpeed FT2 Ice Hockey Skates are designed for speed and agility, while the Reebok RBK 3K Skates are built for stability and power. The JetSpeed FT2 Skates have a lower profile and a shorter blade for a quicker stride, while the RBK 3K Skates have a taller profile and a longer blade for more power. both Skates are equipped with tuuk lightspeed edge Holders and Runners.

Ice Hockey Skates CCM JetSpeed FT2 Reebok RBK 3K Hockey Skate
Summary
Rating
Review Rating 100%
Review Rating Not Rated
Rank
#3400
#9450
Weight 721 Grams 322 Grams
Heat Moldable Yes
Holder Speedblade XS
Runner SB XS1 Black
Tongue Material Metatomic Tongue With Molded Lace-Bite Protection
Boot Construction LiteFrame 360 Evo - One Piece
Liner Totaldri Pro + With Durazone Abrasion Protection
Outsole Construction N/A (1-Piece Boot)
Footbed CCM Orthomove
Warranty 90 Days 30 Days
Product Line JetSpeed
Product Length 0.00
Stick Finish Grip
Textured No
Length 40 Flex: 49", 50 Flex: 52"
Construction Material SigmaTex
Kick Point Position Mid
Shaft Design Jetspeed Shaft
Blade Construction JF-80 BLADE
Tapered X-FLOW TECHNOLOGY
Family JetSpeed
Details
Brand CCM Reebok
Prices
MSRP $114.99 $39.99
Used Price $80.49 $27.99
Sale Price $103.49 $35.99

Ice Hockey Skates Descriptions

CCM JetSpeed FT2

The CCM JetSpeed FT2 is a high-performance, low-profile hockey stick designed for speed and quickness on the ice. The stick features a carbon fiber shaft and blade for stiffness and durability, and a unique blade construction that helps reduce drag for faster shot speeds. The FT2 also has an ergonomic grip design and a lightweight feel for improved control and comfort.

Reebok RBK 3K Hockey Skate

The Reebok 3K Skate is a great choice for the beginning hockey player. It is a comfortable skate that provides good support and stability. The blade is made of high-quality steel and is designed to provide good grip and durability.

Suggested Comparisons